From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: How badly do you want to get beaten up for crappy, inane video?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: How badly do you want to get beaten up for crappy, inane video?
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 22:24:21 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <020220182224215917%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <77h47d9d52rs1iq5fvgj47qsgqq5n3eom0@4ax.com> <310120181744134985%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1k57dlfi0rr8hk7i4uad36sidrrq85l8q@4ax.com> <010220180919475046%nospam@nospam.invalid> <66a77dlb85d1ruamajquvd28hk2nsilses@4ax.com> <010220181928387092%nospam@nospam.invalid> <rsc87ddrt4u68jm6l7nhribnpk6g6dichg@4ax.com> <020220180800489820%nospam@nospam.invalid> <47q97dt32bgqim8jldno7qps1nf0fdid5t@4ax.com> <020220181811137578%nospam@nospam.invalid> <r2aa7d56ctop6ujifgt657pnp48mklp3fe@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="496e318c40270506d2e0a937b9ef5470";
logging-data="23762"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/0K4pY/1fkMIrtuuQjU4x"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YDp3luFIuMOHlP//cKMkOZ0Nq2w=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<r2aa7d56ctop6ujifgt657pnp48mklp3fe@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

> >> >> >> So, you see I did not mention networking in a discussion about Spyder
> >> >> >> issues.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >then why did you mention networking issues in a discussion about spyder
> >> >> >and permissions?
> >> >> 
> >> >> Read the fucking thread. You will find that I have already explained
> >> >> this in more detail than I am accustomed to get from you.
> >> >
> >> >avoiding answering, as usual.
> >> >
> >> >nowhere did you say why you mentioned networking.
> >> 
> >> In the context of file permissions. It's just a few paragraphs above.
> >> Can't you understand it?
> >
> >except that your spyder problem involved a locally attached device, so
> >there wouldn't be any networking.
> 
> Which is why I didn't lump them together.

except you did exactly that.

> >thus your mentioning networking was a new context.
> 
> It arose from Bill W's mention of problems arising from file
> permissions.

how so? networking was not a factor in your situation.