Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
On 05/02/2018 19:45, RJH wrote:
> UK: I suspect that's something to do with it - I think 100Mbps is there
> if people are willing to pay. Which as it happens I do - £30/month for
> basic landline and mobile, and 100Mbps internet.
> I suppose 1000Mbs would be nice, but hardly necessary. I can download
> 1GB through a VPN in a couple of minutes which seems fine.
GBP £34/mo (US $48) for 200 Mbps down, 12 Mbps up. VirginMedia HFC
(hybrid fibre cable), co-ax to the house from fibre at the end of the
street. Up is a little limiting at times, down is 200 Mbps except
during the evening (20:00). I frequently download 700 MB files (weather
satellite data), and a couple of times a week a full Win-10 install (~4
GB, I'm on the Windows Insider program. No local fibre from other
suppliers yet - I would likely change if there were a competitive offer.
That's Internet /only/ though. It seems that Virgin don't offer
anything alike a combined phone/mobile/Internet package. Produces more
income, I suppose!