Subject: Re: Lightroom Classic CC problem
In article <email@example.com>, Mayayana<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> But you also have to remember that you really
> shouldn't be trying to do real work on Windows 10.
> You're an unpaid beta tester. The system configuration
> can be changed at any time, willy nilly, as Microsoft
> decides to zap you with their next test version that
> corporate customers don't have to put up with.
> That may seem snide, or anti-Win10, or
> anti-Microsoft, but it's actually just plain fact.
it's not remotely close to fact. it's complete bullshit.
> Win10 is not a stable system.
you don't run win10 so you're not in a position to comment.
win10 is actually very stable, much more than your beloved windows xp.
nothing is perfect and there will *always* be bugs, no matter what the
> System updates
> need to be carefully tested over time for
then it's a good thing that's what happens.
microsoft deploys updates in a staggered fashion, first with insiders
who volunteer to test upcoming builds, then when it's stable, it's
released a subset of users known to have compatible hardware, and over
time, larger and larger groups of users so that any bumps along the way
can be quickly resolved before affecting users..
what they don't do is push untested updates to everyone.
> Corporate IT people do that before
> rolling out updates to their "fleet". Prior to Win10,
> even those tested updates were tested for months
> or years *before* the IT people got them.
eric is *not* corporate it.
nor are you.
> A Windows version or service pack was
> created, tested, released to volunteer beta testers
> in version after version.... Only after months or
> even years of that was the final version released for
> IT people to start their own testing. It no longer
> works that way.
yes it does.
> You're getting largely untested
> updates that Microsoft forces down your throat
> when the mood hits them.
> With Win10, you're running one of the test machines
> without getting paid for your trouble.
> But it is worth searching. You'll find out a lot more
> that way then by looking specifically in Adobe forums
> or photo newsgroups, especially given that you don't
> know where the problem is coming from.
it's clear where one problem is coming from.