Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
Full headers:
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 15:41:25 -0500
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<> <p5ac9e$7fi$>
<> <p5asj3$ti0$>
<> <070220181632253766%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<> <>
<> <080220181457410991%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <080220181457410991%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 2671
X-Received-Body-CRC: 353188413
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/8/2018 2:57 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article<>, PeterN
> <"peter,newdelete"> wrote:
>> OTA would not work for me. Indoor reception is terrible, and use of an
>> outdoor antenna is not permitted.
> yes it is.
> <
> and-satellite-dishes>
>    Under the OTARD rules, an owner or a tenant has the right to install
>    an antenna on property that he owns or over which he has exclusive
>    use or control. This includes single family homes, condominiums,
>    cooperatives, townhomes and manufactured homes.
What is written is one thing. Practicality is something else. I am not 
about to spend time in litigation, creating a brouhaha with my 
neighbors, to save a few bucks. There is much more to life. e.g. It cost 
us about $50,000 in damages, plus legal fees, because our board would 
not permit a companion dog, which is expressly permitted under the ADA. 
The US attorney handled the litigation for the woman.

>> What I am looking for is to get basic
>> Internet service with local channels. I would then use a service that
>> allows me to pick only the stations I watch. I have zero interest in the
>> movies, except for some old classics.
> roku or apple tv.