Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news2
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 15:43:22 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <p5icpb1j6h@news2.newsguy.com>
References: <fdie7bFp5cuU1@mid.individual.net>
<d306366d-37ba-41ff-82f6-d8a83a43508d@googlegroups.com>
<ju9a7dh4tmolj8q3j4te3j7hev8p5bjita@4ax.com>
<888b1254-58c4-4955-b155-70518f0682ef@googlegroups.com>
<dcydnUo70uMrCOXHnZ2dnUU7-TnNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<fdrk22Fs8smU1@mid.individual.net> <p5ac9e$7fi$1@dont-email.me>
<OIudnWi2P6zjeuXHnZ2dnUU7-IvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <p5asj3$ti0$1@dont-email.me>
<p5fove01dok@news4.newsguy.com> <070220181632253766%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p5glkp02fu3@news7.newsguy.com> <080220180119034057%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p5i9hc0120o@news1.newsguy.com> <080220181509373971%nospam@nospam.invalid>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p53a303e4c20424a99dd93d34e8d431d474c66e77b51ed7fe.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <080220181509373971%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 2163
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3033121288
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/8/2018 3:09 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article<p5i9hc0120o@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN
> <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:
> 
>>>> To get what I want online is too much of a PITA. If you
>>>> know an easy and reliable way, please tell. I looked at sling, but they
>>>> could not provide what I want.
>>>
>>> what content do you want?
>>>
>>> have you looked at roku or appletv ?
>>>
>> Thanks, I looked at them. The do not have all of the channels I watch.
> 
> such as which ones?
> 
> if you want useful suggestions, you have to cease being vague.
> 

I am vague because I value my privacy. Also, notice that I stated in my 
first comment on this issue, that getting what I want online is too much 
of a PITA. I am talking about the necessary physical setup.


-- 
PeterN