From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 15:48:41 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <080220181548414614%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <p5ac9e$7fi$> <> <p5asj3$ti0$> <> <070220181632253766%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <> <> <080220181457410991%nospam@nospam.invalid> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="cbfccedfaa21d704d1c68463b14c3857";
logging-data="7831"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18guBCpoLPB3Ar3Be2N4JYq"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:REUgLq7jhtq17f92xaVIIr8AXa0=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, PeterN
<"peter,newdelete"> wrote:

> >> OTA would not work for me. Indoor reception is terrible, and use of an
> >> outdoor antenna is not permitted.
> > 
> > yes it is.
> > 
> > <
> > and-satellite-dishes>
> >    Under the OTARD rules, an owner or a tenant has the right to install
> >    an antenna on property that he owns or over which he has exclusive
> >    use or control. This includes single family homes, condominiums,
> >    cooperatives, townhomes and manufactured homes.
> > 
> What is written is one thing. Practicality is something else. I am not 
> about to spend time in litigation, creating a brouhaha with my 
> neighbors, to save a few bucks. There is much more to life. e.g. It cost 
> us about $50,000 in damages, plus legal fees, because our board would 
> not permit a companion dog, which is expressly permitted under the ADA. 
> The US attorney handled the litigation for the woman.

put an antenna *inside* your apartment, in window. done.