From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Lightroom Classic CC problem
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Lightroom Classic CC problem
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 23:14:07 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <080220182314078180%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <p5cipj$o45$> <> <> <p5ft8h$8lv$> <> <p5hos0$8ra$> <080220181114116368%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p5i5q8$f0p$> <080220181359029826%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p5i8g5$46n$> <080220181509373937%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p5iheb$985$> <080220181724078165%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p5in4a$1vth$> <080220182042181664%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p5j4pd$hi1$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="80930e7a787655e91909a8c65f8d8b3a";
logging-data="6777"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1//kipyXRa3k1X+k8UuO4gQ"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qR4Rg3qTdu8Jlig0j/hDE1kNy3s=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <p5j4pd$hi1$>, Mayayana<mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

> | i said it's for all intents not possible to block everything and that
> | it only takes a tiny leak to piece the entire puzzle together.
> |
>   Another way to look at it: If naysayers like yourself
> would just stop arguing and spend even a few minutes
> dealing with the issue -- find a techie friend to set
> you up with a HOSTS file and adjust your privacy
> settings in software you use -- then the spyware
> economy would collapse. You can easily reduce the
> spying on yourself to a trickle.

you need to get off your high horse.

not only do i have a hosts file, which is appropriate for blocking
*some* sites (not all), but i also use *far* more sophisticated and
easier to use tools that can automatically detect and block suspicious
sites on the fly. i also use more than one browser, configured from
very locked down to very (but not fully) open, depending on the site.

which *still* misses the point, in that you *can't* block everything
unless you go off the grid, and even then, you're still being tracked.

you *are* leaking data, far more than you realize and in ways you
haven't thought of, ones which google, facebook and others have known
for years.

for online, start here:

>   The spyware business model only works because
> people like you can't be bothered to deal with the
> control you have. It's not about having total privacy.
> The point is just to not make it easy for companies
> like Google to have a dossier on you for advertising.

another one of your incorrect assumptions.

you have *no* idea what i do or don't do in regards to google or other


> Anyway, do as you like. I'm not going to argue
> anymore. It was worthwhile only insofar as it
> might have provided some information useful
> to others. 

except you didn't.

all you did was demonstrate how little you know about the topic.