From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.tu-darmstadt.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 07:48:53 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <fe4uilF1oejU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <fdie7bFp5cuU1@mid.individual.net> <d306366d-37ba-41ff-82f6-d8a83a43508d@googlegroups.com> <ju9a7dh4tmolj8q3j4te3j7hev8p5bjita@4ax.com> <888b1254-58c4-4955-b155-70518f0682ef@googlegroups.com> <dcydnUo70uMrCOXHnZ2dnUU7-TnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <fdrk22Fs8smU1@mid.individual.net> <p5ac9e$7fi$1@dont-email.me> <OIudnWi2P6zjeuXHnZ2dnUU7-IvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <p5asj3$ti0$1@dont-email.me> <p5fove01dok@news4.newsguy.com> <070220181632253766%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p5glkp02fu3@news7.newsguy.com> <50on7d1oiur9aemsavj4c8b9p4j8k94dtg@4ax.com> <p5i87c011fv@news1.newsguy.com> <080220181457410991%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p5iclm0j6h@news2.newsguy.com> <080220181548414614%nospam@nospam.invalid> <p5ima50n0l@news2.newsguy.com> <080220182008098713%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net TpV/pRwPeqOqM9kAwpQN7gCLSrF0GfXvhEX3vpC0bszTFkGdQ9
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sxsNvra+s5UfJ16DDBrS2y2RgXI=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-02-09 01:08:09 +0000, nospam said:

> In article<p5ima50n0l@news2.newsguy.com>, PeterN
> <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> OTA would not work for me. Indoor reception is terrible, and use of an
>>>>>> outdoor antenna is not permitted.
>>>>> 
>>>>> yes it is.
>>>>> 
>>>>> <https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/installing-consumer-owned-anten...
>>>>> and-satellite-dishes>
>>>>> Under the OTARD rules, an owner or a tenant has the right to install
>>>>> an antenna on property that he owns or over which he has exclusive
>>>>> use or control. This includes single family homes, condominiums,
>>>>> cooperatives, townhomes and manufactured homes.
>>>>> 
>>>> What is written is one thing. Practicality is something else. I am not
>>>> about to spend time in litigation, creating a brouhaha with my
>>>> neighbors, to save a few bucks. There is much more to life. e.g. It cost
>>>> us about $50,000 in damages, plus legal fees, because our board would
>>>> not permit a companion dog, which is expressly permitted under the ADA.
>>>> The US attorney handled the litigation for the woman.
>>> 
>>> put an antenna *inside* your apartment, in window. done.
>>> 
>> 
>> I did say that would give bad reception.
> 
> all you said is that 'indoor reception is terrible'.
> 
> as with everything else you've said, that's vague.
> 
> you didn't say how terrible or what type of antenna it was. you also
> didn't say whether you put it in a window or more likely put it next to
> the tv, which could make a significant difference depending on what
> types of material in the walls of your house/condo.
> 
> a high gain antenna could work well, possibly even a directional
> antenna if all of the stations you want are broadcasting from the same
> direction (likely from nyc).
> 
> or as has been said before, just get a roku or apple tv and get
> whatever channels you want off the 'net. there's a huge selection, from
> big names to local channels to niche private channels, even 'those'
> channels which you don't want anyone else to know about.

You need have a contact with the station. Either visual or bounced 
using terrain and buildings as "mirrors".
-- 
teleportation kills