Subject: Re: And The Loser Is...
On 2018-02-08 23:25:56 +0000, PeterN said:
> On 2/8/2018 3:48 PM, nospam wrote:
>> In article<firstname.lastname@example.org>, PeterN
>> <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:
>>>>> OTA would not work for me. Indoor reception is terrible, and use of an
>>>>> outdoor antenna is not permitted.
>>>> yes it is.
>>>> Under the OTARD rules, an owner or a tenant has the right to install
>>>> an antenna on property that he owns or over which he has exclusive
>>>> use or control. This includes single family homes, condominiums,
>>>> cooperatives, townhomes and manufactured homes.
>>> What is written is one thing. Practicality is something else. I am not
>>> about to spend time in litigation, creating a brouhaha with my
>>> neighbors, to save a few bucks. There is much more to life. e.g. It cost
>>> us about $50,000 in damages, plus legal fees, because our board would
>>> not permit a companion dog, which is expressly permitted under the ADA.
>>> The US attorney handled the litigation for the woman.
>> put an antenna *inside* your apartment, in window. done.
> I did say that would give bad reception.
Got a cat?