From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
Full headers:
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 05:57:30 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: pJ2d64iAYsLuabg4LFqoCArvPHnQT//mFHKH8DVIkDNhtAb20Y
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mr9zXoQYtWGvhQClRBRDQfCf1bI=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-02-15 04:29:48 +0000, RichA said:

> On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 00:47:15 UTC-5, android  wrote:
>> On 2018-02-14 03:39:42 +0000, RichA said:
>>> I had the GX8.  It's stabilization for non-stabilized Panasonic lenses
>>> was poor, way below that of my Olympus.  But the EVF was superb like
>>> looking out a window.  So they "updated" it with the GX9.  What did
>>> they do?  Dropped the price $200.  Cut out weather resistance.  The EVF
>>> isn't as good.  The stabilization was upgraded to 5-axis.  But what a
>>> let-down.  They've essentially dropped the camera into the lower class
>>> tier.  This was the only non-DSLR-styled body that was in a high tier
>>> as the Gx8.  There were changes to video, but I'm not concerned about
>>> that.
>> I still think that those tiny sensors makes mFT fraudulent...
>> --
>> teleportation kills
> Spare me.  If you can't take a decent picture with one, the fault lies 
> with you.

No, I won't spare you 'cause you are dooomed! Besides the ugly look of 
mFT and FT photos because of the small format itself they just don't 
produce good files since the sensors are tooo small to gather photons 
properly compared to larger sensor with similar tech... :-ppp
teleportation kills