From: not <not@this.time>
Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
Full headers:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:03:49 -0600
From: not@this.time
Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:03:49 -0500
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
X-Trace: sv3-YwGlHTWtDsS6f2p+KNYJqJ1XOh+Sl/5gXHUp5MzrAJszv9PUVkK4lz6Vb+tgja+lbYmOSwlohdx0Lht!JHshJ8pJlE8vvffQ2iMRXqOC//eX7JdNYuJpFZw8T7YUNLeaxwPPJiMI+RisgGIlJrgGkEOb
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1882
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 06:47:10 +0100, android<here@there.was> wrote:

>On 2018-02-14 03:39:42 +0000, RichA said:
>> I had the GX8.  It's stabilization for non-stabilized Panasonic lenses 
>> was poor, way below that of my Olympus.  But the EVF was superb like 
>> looking out a window.  So they "updated" it with the GX9.  What did 
>> they do?  Dropped the price $200.  Cut out weather resistance.  The EVF 
>> isn't as good.  The stabilization was upgraded to 5-axis.  But what a 
>> let-down.  They've essentially dropped the camera into the lower class 
>> tier.  This was the only non-DSLR-styled body that was in a high tier 
>> as the Gx8.  There were changes to video, but I'm not concerned about 
>> that.
>I still think that those tiny sensors makes mFT fraudulent...