From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.237.59.91 with SMTP id q27mr3120971qte.21.1518742313303;
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:51:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.147.5 with SMTP id v5mr874190vkd.5.1518742313045; Thu, 15
Feb 2018 16:51:53 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!h20no264241qtm.0!news-out.google.com!o9ni121qte.1!nntp.google.com!q21no262338qtn.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:51:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <feki9qFju6qU1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.157.72.115;
posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.157.72.115
References: <70584711-152a-4d0b-a02f-655ebbfceb37@googlegroups.com>
<fei0quF20miU1@mid.individual.net> <c43ed308-66f5-4d29-a56d-ca3d7f03efa0@googlegroups.com>
<feki9qFju6qU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ddf07a52-5fe5-4faf-9703-203663aff2cd@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:51:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 30
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 23:57:37 UTC-5, android  wrote:
> On 2018-02-15 04:29:48 +0000, RichA said:
> 
> > On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 00:47:15 UTC-5, android  wrote:
> >> On 2018-02-14 03:39:42 +0000, RichA said:
> >> 
> >>> I had the GX8.  It's stabilization for non-stabilized Panasonic lenses
> >>> was poor, way below that of my Olympus.  But the EVF was superb like
> >>> looking out a window.  So they "updated" it with the GX9.  What did
> >>> they do?  Dropped the price $200.  Cut out weather resistance.  The EVF
> >>> isn't as good.  The stabilization was upgraded to 5-axis.  But what a
> >>> let-down.  They've essentially dropped the camera into the lower class
> >>> tier.  This was the only non-DSLR-styled body that was in a high tier
> >>> as the Gx8.  There were changes to video, but I'm not concerned about
> >>> that.
> >> 
> >> I still think that those tiny sensors makes mFT fraudulent...
> >> --
> >> teleportation kills
> > 
> > Spare me.  If you can't take a decent picture with one, the fault lies 
> > with you.
> 
> No, I won't spare you 'cause you are dooomed! Besides the ugly look of 
> mFT and FT photos because of the small format itself they just don't 
> produce good files since the sensors are tooo small to gather photons 
> properly compared to larger sensor with similar tech... :-ppp
> -- 
> teleportation kills

Put up, or...