Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
On 2018-02-16 00:51:52 +0000, RichA said:
> On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 23:57:37 UTC-5, android wrote:
>> On 2018-02-15 04:29:48 +0000, RichA said:
>>> On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 00:47:15 UTC-5, android wrote:
>>>> On 2018-02-14 03:39:42 +0000, RichA said:
>>>>> I had the GX8. It's stabilization for non-stabilized Panasonic lenses
>>>>> was poor, way below that of my Olympus. But the EVF was superb like
>>>>> looking out a window. So they "updated" it with the GX9. What did
>>>>> they do? Dropped the price $200. Cut out weather resistance. The EVF
>>>>> isn't as good. The stabilization was upgraded to 5-axis. But what a
>>>>> let-down. They've essentially dropped the camera into the lower class
>>>>> tier. This was the only non-DSLR-styled body that was in a high tier
>>>>> as the Gx8. There were changes to video, but I'm not concerned about
>>>> I still think that those tiny sensors makes mFT fraudulent...
>>>> teleportation kills
>>> Spare me. If you can't take a decent picture with one, the fault lies
>>> with you.
>> No, I won't spare you 'cause you are dooomed! Besides the ugly look of
>> mFT and FT photos because of the small format itself they just don't
>> produce good files since the sensors are tooo small to gather photons
>> properly compared to larger sensor with similar tech... :-ppp
>> teleportation kills
> Put up, or...
You can go to the gallery on my blog to compare pictures captures where
FT, APS-C, APS-H and 35mm FF is used... And an Xperia smartphone...
Unfortunately the negs from my 6x6 Zeiss Nettar seem to have got lost
somehow and all i have is a couple of prints. I might post scans on the
blog at a later date. This link takes you to the Gallery: