From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.74.18 with SMTP id x18mr5598136qka.7.1518831516389;
Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:38:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.160.5 with SMTP id j5mr1210106vke.6.1518831515952; Fri,
16 Feb 2018 17:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21no876577qtn.1!news-out.google.com!e34ni305qtc.0!nntp.google.com!q21no876572qtn.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:38:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fena4rF8he2U1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.157.72.115;
posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.157.72.115
References: <70584711-152a-4d0b-a02f-655ebbfceb37@googlegroups.com>
<fei0quF20miU1@mid.individual.net> <c43ed308-66f5-4d29-a56d-ca3d7f03efa0@googlegroups.com>
<feki9qFju6qU1@mid.individual.net> <ddf07a52-5fe5-4faf-9703-203663aff2cd@googlegroups.com>
<fena4rF8he2U1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <094e33c2-4a39-4393-93b6-2d74f66d43bf@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Panasonic GX9 - FAIL (a cheapened GX8)
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 01:38:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 47
Print Article
Forward Article
On Friday, 16 February 2018 00:56:47 UTC-5, android  wrote:
> On 2018-02-16 00:51:52 +0000, RichA said:
> 
> > On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 23:57:37 UTC-5, android  wrote:
> >> On 2018-02-15 04:29:48 +0000, RichA said:
> >> 
> >>> On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 00:47:15 UTC-5, android  wrote:
> >>>> On 2018-02-14 03:39:42 +0000, RichA said:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> I had the GX8.  It's stabilization for non-stabilized Panasonic lenses
> >>>>> was poor, way below that of my Olympus.  But the EVF was superb like
> >>>>> looking out a window.  So they "updated" it with the GX9.  What did
> >>>>> they do?  Dropped the price $200.  Cut out weather resistance.  The EVF
> >>>>> isn't as good.  The stabilization was upgraded to 5-axis.  But what a
> >>>>> let-down.  They've essentially dropped the camera into the lower class
> >>>>> tier.  This was the only non-DSLR-styled body that was in a high tier
> >>>>> as the Gx8.  There were changes to video, but I'm not concerned about
> >>>>> that.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I still think that those tiny sensors makes mFT fraudulent...
> >>>> --
> >>>> teleportation kills
> >>> 
> >>> Spare me.  If you can't take a decent picture with one, the fault lies
> >>> with you.
> >> 
> >> No, I won't spare you 'cause you are dooomed! Besides the ugly look of
> >> mFT and FT photos because of the small format itself they just don't
> >> produce good files since the sensors are tooo small to gather photons
> >> properly compared to larger sensor with similar tech... :-ppp
> >> --
> >> teleportation kills
> > 
> > Put up, or...
> 
> You can go to the gallery on my blog to compare pictures captures where 
> FT, APS-C, APS-H and 35mm FF is used... And an Xperia smartphone... 
> Unfortunately the negs from my 6x6 Zeiss Nettar seem to have got lost 
> somehow and all i have is a couple of prints. I might post scans on the 
> blog at a later date. This link takes you to the Gallery:
> 
> <https://wp.me/P3strj-2m>
> -- 
> teleportation kills

Some interesting shots, but none really illustrates superiority to m4/3rds.  

http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/image/159650750