From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:44:23 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <170220182344235381%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <19gfxg1i7obzt.832kqu8afpco.dlg@40tude.net> <01c6ac7e-ba29-4845-8830-48a70ceed0b4@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f27371b47fa0810c2f5bf1df9177a55e";
logging-data="15632"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Mju768VQX1xVpd7P49ewX"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zotT1v5f1rv4H6lAc7hM5EohrpU=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<01c6ac7e-ba29-4845-8830-48a70ceed0b4@googlegroups.com>,
RichA<rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 4:3 IS the superior and more useful crop ratio.  Always has been.  

nope.

it depends on the subject.

there is no single best aspect ratio for all situations.