From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Enerloop batteries overpriced?
Full headers:
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Enerloop batteries overpriced?
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 06:31:45 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <170220181836518224%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: blklhVGESqNZoXAKZLqp1QozEUzSkuMwz+cc0pk0Hi74Xszlfl
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7UENBQvj3xhi4wJi2ILXxLdKukg=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-02-17 23:36:51 +0000, nospam said:

> In article<>, Alfred
> Molon<> wrote:
>> Another thing, a guy who works for Intel (he analyses defects in CPUs)
>> told me that processors degrade over time, i.e. they age (at least those
>> used in consumer products).
> no they don't.
>> Apparently over time CPU develop defects, which make them slower or
>> might even cause them to stop working completely. If so, it's not a good
>> idea buying a 6 years old computer.
> nonsense.

Not non sense.The heat of daily use degrades any material like the 
transistors in solid state amplifiers. The computer chips are miniatyrs 
of traditional circuits and should degrade faste than, let's say my now 
defucked Luxman amp!


teleportation kills