From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: Enerloop batteries overpriced?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Enerloop batteries overpriced?
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 15:26:25 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <fetgohFkd49U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <7ea34d45-5a04-4aad-ad25-269a67d79723@googlegroups.com> <MPG.34f2a94a3488daf198cf60@news.supernews.com> <4fWdnU_lNuqPARXHnZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <MPG.34f2d56e2af3003898cf61@news.supernews.com> <MPG.34f2d9713b3a154d98cf62@news.supernews.com> <170220181836518224%nospam@nospam.invalid> <feshe1Fdkm8U1@mid.individual.net> <180220180100259097%nospam@nospam.invalid> <e89f38dd-3329-4f90-9711-186a53e9e759@googlegroups.com> <180220180853396703%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net hVnAfZJlC8VxAZ/ZHE51swrW4sK/pJHW74BA47aP69n2xolGuZ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:POaoEK9ral0FhMW9MPsyftxxdro=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-02-18 13:53:39 +0000, nospam said:

> In article<e89f38dd-3329-4f90-9711-186a53e9e759@googlegroups.com>,
> RichA<rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> electrolytic caps, particularly those from the early '00s, can fail,
>>> but that's an entirely different problem (they were defective) and one
>>> that's easily fixed.
>> 
>> Electrolytic caps degrade over time, no matter how good they are.
> 
> not significantly (unless defective), but easily replaced if needed, as
> i said.

Well... The caps plague came at convenient time in the digitalisation 
of home electronics process! : -ppp

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague>
-- 
teleportation kills