Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.windows7.general
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:29:40 +0700
Organization: albasani.net
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <1sucv1hqkm69j.1srj76gl8tuo7$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <19gfxg1i7obzt.832kqu8afpco.dlg@40tude.net> <p6alqc$sk5$1@dont-email.me> <170220182050480435%nospam@nospam.invalid> <n0lmy7amjq04$.8fdtbl2khv2a.dlg@40tude.net> <170220182135361720%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.albasani.net 36MBp6Ei39L5etheiL0fQbwv9/E3kf4+t1XJC+gGBeDJzrCEIyoS50M/HcRAaDftwEb35A2q8F8zwEHx+C3D6A==
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:29:40 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="27qPb+GfImNpQGkFP7CsinlMtgtFbjFPjf1KgLXozme3wLBCw7CmIMarSEZjtaPG82MZDA7m/fUUvP3ORbaJzFFaDn4YCNW6uP9qP3srI7jIb9rFiHRw5bsBX5+aZADi"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.84
X-Bitcoin: 1LcqwCQBQmhcWfWsVEAeyLchkAY8ZfuMnS
X-Face: \*\`0(1j~VfYC>ebz[&O.]=,Nm\oRM{of,liRO#7Eqi4|!]!(Gs=Akgh{J)605>C9Air?pa d{sSZ09u+A7f<^paR"/NH_#<mE1S"hde\c6PZLUB[t/s5-+Iu5DSc?P0+4%,Hl
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4t72g/hVK/fOhsub4yc2218X3x0=
Print Article
Forward Article
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 21:35:36 -0500, nospam wrote:

> In article <n0lmy7amjq04$.8fdtbl2khv2a.dlg@40tude.net>, JJ
><jj4public@vfemail.net> wrote:
> 
>>>>   This is designed to be simple, quick cropping and
>>>> resizing, while retaining the best possible image
>>>> quality when desired. (Crop a JPG and you'll
>>>> lose some quality, 
>>> 
>>> not when it's a lossless or non-destructive crop.
>> 
>> That's true for lossless. But the cropping itself is always destructive.
> 
> no it isn't.

You misunderstood. If you crop an image to keep only the left side, the
right ride of the image will be gone. Meaning that the crop function itself
removes data. Whether there's an undo or redo functionality or not, that an
entire different function.

> 
> bmp is obsolete.

In a Mac OS, BMP isn't even the native image container. So, I would be
obvious that most, if not all of Mac softwares don't use BMP.

In Windows however, not so. BMP is the native image format in that OS. i.e.
used by the graphic kernel.