Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
On Monday, 19 February 2018 11:23:15 UTC, android wrote:
> On 2018-02-19 10:58:57 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
> > On Monday, 19 February 2018 06:02:52 UTC, android wrote:
> >> On 2018-02-18 23:01:48 +0000, RichA said:
> >>> Ugh.
> >> Beware. Indian friendly folks in da house! Those pictures reminded me
> >> of Irving Penns photographs of tribal africans:
> >> <http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/213074?search_no=1&...
> >> Anyways: I prefer fugly women with heads before bimbos that do ANYTHING
> >> to get those fifteen minutes... If you need porn go to www.playboy.com!
> >> --
> >> teleportation kills
> > I've never thought as playboy as porn, mild titillation at best.
> Well, if you define porn as an aid to get into a state of sexual
> excitement then it, Playboy is for many folks stateside.
I don't think it is, I had the front cover or every playboy since it was released via a binaries
group, not one of the pics I'd condider porn.
They have always refered to themselves as being in the glamour business than porn.
> Be sure of
> that. And exploitive it is.
to who ?
>I don't need porn though but I perceived an
> air of disappointment of the non porn pics in the Michelin calendar...
I wouldn't class the Michelin calendar as porn either.
I've never classed the pictures of girls showing their tits as porn either.
For me a porn picture woukld have to depict porn as in some sort of sex act taking place, rather
than someone on a beach topless.