From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.237.47.162 with SMTP id m31mr12183225qtd.14.1519054125702;
Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:28:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.153.195 with SMTP id b186mr1275143vke.14.1519054125514;
Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21no2315840qtn.1!news-out.google.com!m4ni321qte.0!nntp.google.com!y7no1438296qtn.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:28:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fevqcsF5h4mU1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <1ac80c3a-5746-47dc-b881-bba99d4faeba@googlegroups.com>
<fev7k6F1fe6U1@mid.individual.net> <b6dbb329-bfb5-4df1-adb6-272088f68bee@googlegroups.com>
<fevqcsF5h4mU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4c2153a1-6175-44c1-9615-f95dc17b3b5d@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:28:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 43
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 19 February 2018 11:23:15 UTC, android  wrote:
> On 2018-02-19 10:58:57 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
> 
> > On Monday, 19 February 2018 06:02:52 UTC, android  wrote:
> >> On 2018-02-18 23:01:48 +0000, RichA said:
> >> 
> >>> Ugh.
> >> 
> >> Beware. Indian friendly folks in da house! Those pictures reminded me
> >> of Irving Penns photographs of tribal africans:
> >> 
> >> <http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/artwork/213074?search_no=1&...
> >> 
> >> Anyways: I prefer fugly women with heads before bimbos that do ANYTHING
> >> to get those fifteen minutes... If you need porn go to www.playboy.com!
> >> --
> >> teleportation kills
> > 
> > I've never thought as playboy as porn, mild titillation at best.
> 
> Well, if you define porn as an aid to get into a state of sexual 
> excitement then it, Playboy is for many folks stateside.

I don't think it is, I had the front cover or every playboy since it was released via a binaries
group, not one of the pics I'd condider porn.
They have always refered to themselves as being in the glamour business than porn.



> Be sure of 
> that. And exploitive it is. 

to who ?


>I don't need porn though but I perceived an 
> air of disappointment of the non porn pics in the Michelin calendar...

I wouldn't class the Michelin calendar as porn either.

I've never classed the pictures of girls showing their tits as porn either.
For me a porn picture woukld have to depict porn as in some sort of sex act taking place, rather
than someone on a beach topless.