Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!2a00:1d38:fa:feed::183.MISMATCH!feeder3.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder4.feed.usenet.farm!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news7
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:26:07 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <p6ioea01o85@news7.newsguy.com>
References: <1ac80c3a-5746-47dc-b881-bba99d4faeba@googlegroups.com>
<p6d26j$1jb$1@dont-email.me>
<IIudnUeHtfE5qRbHnZ2dnUU78UGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
<p6fe0u$f3m$1@dont-email.me> <cd6n8dpl0hts06mkr9dtck0725v0p5u5a5@4ax.com>
<p6hdjn$dl0$1@dont-email.me> <UdWdndXmVYhQ3xHHnZ2dnUU78bPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<fkho8dp71624bnfv0lvm7up0haptg6i73t@4ax.com>
<6rednZF-o_SkzhHHnZ2dnUU78YPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <p6ho25$peu$1@dont-email.me>
<wqSdnRJG0q8p-hHHnZ2dnUU7-e_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p900390acefba04b37897a1a2c5aec861babe00c128ffabad.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <wqSdnRJG0q8p-hHHnZ2dnUU7-e_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 1946
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3946313394
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/20/2018 1:23 PM, Savageduck wrote:
> Mayayana<mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote
>>
>> | I never found the appeal, just as I never found the appeal with "Star
>>   Trek"
>> | and its offspring.
>>
>> Holy Moley! Get outta town!!
>>
>> Y O U  N E V E R  L I K E D  S T A R  T R E K???!!!
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Yup! I never liked Star Trek, it was silly beyond belief, and Shatner was
> all ham.
> 

That may be true, but it was leading in a sociological way. It had 
people in highly responsible roles, regardless of their sex, race, or 
religion. It had interracial kissing, which was considered taboo at the 
time.


-- 
PeterN