Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.39.230 with SMTP id x35mr1406941qtx.49.1519183949460;
Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:32:29 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21no168333qtn.1!news-out.google.com!m4ni36qte.0!nntp.google.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news1
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:31:33 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <p6ip6n01ris@news1.newsguy.com>
References: <1ac80c3a-5746-47dc-b881-bba99d4faeba@googlegroups.com>
<p6d26j$1jb$1@dont-email.me>
<IIudnUeHtfE5qRbHnZ2dnUU78UGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
<p6fe0u$f3m$1@dont-email.me> <cd6n8dpl0hts06mkr9dtck0725v0p5u5a5@4ax.com>
<p6hdjn$dl0$1@dont-email.me> <UdWdndXmVYhQ3xHHnZ2dnUU78bPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<fkho8dp71624bnfv0lvm7up0haptg6i73t@4ax.com> <p6hnv5$oo4$1@dont-email.me>
<wqSdnQ1G0q8o-hHHnZ2dnUU7-e9QAAAA@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc2a4d1c6e05b1bd8376799689446d6c46474e469880a8388.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <wqSdnQ1G0q8o-hHHnZ2dnUU7-e9QAAAA@giganews.com>
X-Received-Bytes: 3232
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4226307964
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/20/2018 1:23 PM, Savageduck wrote:
> Mayayana<mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>> "Tony Cooper"<tonycooper214@gmail.com> wrote
>>
>> | I understand that not all people's interests are the same, but we look
>> | forward to every "Masterpiece" series.  Currently, it's "Victoria" and
>> | it's quite good.
>>
>>    Ah, so you're the guy who's watching two high
>> school kids dressed up as royalty and playing
>> house. I wondered who it was. :)
> 
> Rather than two kidsdressed up as royalty I would recommend watching “Wolf
> Hall” which will give you an interesting look into Tudor politics, and is
> much better than any of the pablum US networks produce.
>>
>> | If liking the "Masterpiece" productions, and not US TV reality shows,
>> | talent shows, cooking shows, and dancing competitions make me a
>> | "highbrow" type, I say "It's a fair cop, Guv."
>> |
>>
>>     I criticize them because they're really no better
>> than American daytime soaps. But they're considered
>> higher quality simply because they're British.
> 
> Actually they are far better than American daytime soaps, with far superior
> acting and production values.
> 
> It sounds as if your particular prejudices have oozed into your TV viewing.
> 
>> Though
>> I guess I'm also a harsh judge. I don't like any series
>> type of show because the story is enslaved to the
>> need for repetition. They come up with a formula and
>> then the viewers watch each week specifically to
>> see another rendition of the same formula. It can
>> work as entertainment, but rarely as art. (Which
>> makes it another example of android's famous "porn".)
>> I generally only watch movies and documentaries.
> 
> Then you are depriving yourself of some very good viewing, some of which is
> far better than many movies these days.
> ...and most are far from formulaic.
> 

I used to enjoy Benny Hill, and Are you Being Served. British comedy was 
quite enjoyable. Also Masterpiece Theater, was intriguing.



-- 
PeterN