From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: People Keep Walking Into Glass at Apple Park
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: People Keep Walking Into Glass at Apple Park
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:45:52 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <ff54fhFc1ogU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <1a18a948-6a7f-465d-930d-1bb8f0d6bceb@googlegroups.com> <200220181243457729%nospam@nospam.invalid> <d19cd30d-6115-4dde-ad64-303552abb9cb@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net UvMzTYoyW9Zw639Ww4/Ofwz4RvMaNMPrZVZ2z29A0dLpkeV0M/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SfrJi1S1hKd5TVrsbNQ110KxVuk=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-02-21 11:09:30 +0000, Whisky-dave said:

> On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 17:43:51 UTC, nospam  wrote:
>> In article<1a18a948-6a7f-465d-930d-1bb8f0d6bceb@googlegroups.com>,
>> RichA<rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> "Quite hard to see?"  Maybe if you're stoned all the time.  Glass reflects 4%
>>> at each surface (perpendicular rays) and a lot more at glancing angles.
>>> Hard not to actually see it.
>> 
>> nowhere near 4%.
>> 
>> if that were the case, a camera lens with multiple surfaces would be
>> nearly opaque.
> 
> Maybe that's why people don't walk into camera lenes :-D

But they do, call the photog a stalker and later they sue...
-- 
teleportation kills