From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}>
Subject: Re: Shooting in wet weather? Re-consider using your $3000+ Sony
Full headers:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:10:13 -0600
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY=
Subject: Re: Shooting in wet weather? Re-consider using your $3000+ Sony
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}>
References: <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:10:13 -0600
Lines: 14
X-Trace: sv3-WO5dhyM7yXup0etOWyZTzPj7HN2Hv/MXWCM9Gs6LM6Sop4DVbX3BKJzVE2kRR0U7TryB9wNf1QnnWH9!JVMXcy1LrBbowNYpMEhP7dfuVxpf8VkY0/6tPdN+HUEQ2WAgYQob3XLXS4C0Pi+jgRpbkV2ZQLkM!6g==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1596
Print Article
Forward Article
<not@this.time> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:02:06 -0800 (PST), RichA<>
> wrote:
>> Apparently, their bodies are not exactly weather proof, or maybe even
>> resistant.  More than one source has indicated this.  Might want to stick to a pro DSLR.
> Or an Olympus E-M1 II.

Try a Fujifilm X-Pro2, X-T2, or X-H1 with an appropriate WR lens.