From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.52.39 with SMTP id u36mr3922517qtb.55.1519268468838;
Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:01:08 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!y7no1724312qtn.0!news-out.google.com!o9ni7050qte.1!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx05.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.windows7.general
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Message-ID: <9jcs8dpj8gbfrm28c42070hb8e7rbmq0ja@4ax.com>
References: <vl8n8dh49bis5nfa8tbjf5tcmmad8hs37f@4ax.com> <190220182330046077%nospam@nospam.invalid> <8j8p8d9l3rsl986g2bolt8f2jke5tpoci6@4ax.com> <200220181743186156%nospam@nospam.invalid> <vhhp8d94ensu2fptngseiu03tf1lc88p50@4ax.com> <200220182022590986%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ktop8d1ekuh567kqrgmu4p6v38bjnrmqq8@4ax.com> <200220182238075666%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qvor8d1jhf33ieb6v7ms7dukscjljt7297@4ax.com> <210220181633290642%nospam@nospam.invalid>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 40
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:01:12 +1300
X-Received-Bytes: 2219
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3104659725
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 2075
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:33:29 -0500, nospam<nospam@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>In article<qvor8d1jhf33ieb6v7ms7dukscjljt7297@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens
><eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> >> >> >> You shouldn't have put the 'yep' at the beginning of your answer.
>> >> >> >> That
>> >> >> >> way you were confirming that "we only have a single BMP obsessed
>> >> >> >> Windows user in this NG."
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >comprehension fail.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> You explain it then.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> The technical term is 'parse'.
>> >> >
>> >> >that explains why. english is not source code that is parsed.
>> >> >
>> >> Hysterical laughter!
>> >> 
>> >> I was taught to parse sentences in English 75 years ago. I expect you
>> >> think it is a technical term applying only to computer languages.
>> >
>> >it is in the way you're using it. context is key.
>> >
>> >spoken language is not parsed the way source code is.
>> 
>> So?
>> 
>> Can you only parse source code?
>
>whoosh.

Evasion noted.
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens