From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.windows7.general
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:33:25 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <210220182233259990%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <vl8n8dh49bis5nfa8tbjf5tcmmad8hs37f@4ax.com> <190220182330046077%nospam@nospam.invalid> <8j8p8d9l3rsl986g2bolt8f2jke5tpoci6@4ax.com> <200220181743186156%nospam@nospam.invalid> <vhhp8d94ensu2fptngseiu03tf1lc88p50@4ax.com> <200220182022590986%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ktop8d1ekuh567kqrgmu4p6v38bjnrmqq8@4ax.com> <200220182238075666%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qvor8d1jhf33ieb6v7ms7dukscjljt7297@4ax.com> <210220181633290642%nospam@nospam.invalid> <9jcs8dpj8gbfrm28c42070hb8e7rbmq0ja@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a6f80d165dae92ed69a6d0dc4f1e3762";
logging-data="18688"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0ZLLoMjikdjucJroXQIlq"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4mP+zV+E53nGsZypHb/SDmQDUVU=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<9jcs8dpj8gbfrm28c42070hb8e7rbmq0ja@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:


> >> >> >> >> You shouldn't have put the 'yep' at the beginning of your answer.
> >> >> >> >> That
> >> >> >> >> way you were confirming that "we only have a single BMP obsessed
> >> >> >> >> Windows user in this NG."
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >comprehension fail.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> You explain it then.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> The technical term is 'parse'.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >that explains why. english is not source code that is parsed.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Hysterical laughter!
> >> >> 
> >> >> I was taught to parse sentences in English 75 years ago. I expect you
> >> >> think it is a technical term applying only to computer languages.
> >> >
> >> >it is in the way you're using it. context is key.
> >> >
> >> >spoken language is not parsed the way source code is.
> >> 
> >> So?
> >> 
> >> Can you only parse source code?
> >
> >whoosh.
> 
> Evasion noted.

nope. you *completely* missed the point.