Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id s4mr4311435qke.50.1519279012128;
Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:56:52 -0800 (PST)
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:55:42 -0500
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<p6fe0u$f3m$> <>
<p6hdjn$dl0$> <>
<> <p6ho25$peu$>
<> <200220182238065598%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<> <210220181337447953%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <210220181337447953%nospam@nospam.invalid>
X-Received-Bytes: 2610
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4063042576
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/21/2018 1:37 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article<>, PeterN
> <"peter,newdelete"> wrote:
>>>> Last year there was a Star Trek exhibit on the Intrepid. It combined the
>>>> original with the Next Generation. I was told that most of the actors
>>>> were nice, regular guys. William Shattner was charging for his
>>>> autograph. I leave the name for that, up to the readers.
>>> most of them do that. they know the fans will pay, so why not.
>> Not when they are being paid for the appearance. And the fans are making
>> a generous donation to a charity.
> yes when they're being paid for the appearance.
> i've been to several cons and paying for autographs and/or photos is
> standard fare.
> the lines are long, so few people find it to be an issue.
>> BTW I used to represent entertainers. Most thought it beneath them to
>> charge for an autograph. They either declined, or gave one free. I don't
>> know the source for your statement, but I KNOW it's not true.
> personal experience is my source.
You go to charitable events where the donation is between $500 and 
$1,000 per person, and then paid for an autograph?
I have difficulty believing that.