From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.unit0.net!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx15.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.windows7.general
Subject: Re: Windows freeware to lock in a 3: or 4:3 aspect ratio for cropping
Message-ID: <2p0t8d1f1hcfm6o0uikcnf230it1vjbcee@4ax.com>
References: <8j8p8d9l3rsl986g2bolt8f2jke5tpoci6@4ax.com> <200220181743186156%nospam@nospam.invalid> <vhhp8d94ensu2fptngseiu03tf1lc88p50@4ax.com> <200220182022590986%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ktop8d1ekuh567kqrgmu4p6v38bjnrmqq8@4ax.com> <200220182238075666%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qvor8d1jhf33ieb6v7ms7dukscjljt7297@4ax.com> <210220181633290642%nospam@nospam.invalid> <9jcs8dpj8gbfrm28c42070hb8e7rbmq0ja@4ax.com> <210220182233259990%nospam@nospam.invalid>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 21:46:23 +1300
X-Received-Bytes: 2490
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1935133884
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:33:25 -0500, nospam<nospam@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>In article<9jcs8dpj8gbfrm28c42070hb8e7rbmq0ja@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens
><eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:
>
>
>> >> >> >> >> You shouldn't have put the 'yep' at the beginning of your answer.
>> >> >> >> >> That
>> >> >> >> >> way you were confirming that "we only have a single BMP obsessed
>> >> >> >> >> Windows user in this NG."
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >comprehension fail.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> You explain it then.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> The technical term is 'parse'.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >that explains why. english is not source code that is parsed.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Hysterical laughter!
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I was taught to parse sentences in English 75 years ago. I expect you
>> >> >> think it is a technical term applying only to computer languages.
>> >> >
>> >> >it is in the way you're using it. context is key.
>> >> >
>> >> >spoken language is not parsed the way source code is.
>> >> 
>> >> So?
>> >> 
>> >> Can you only parse source code?
>> >
>> >whoosh.
>> 
>> Evasion noted.
>
>nope. you *completely* missed the point.

You mean you have one? It certainly wasn't the one we started off
discussing.

If you do have a point, why can't you explain it?
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens