Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.52.39 with SMTP id u36mr4939516qtb.55.1519306983866;
Thu, 22 Feb 2018 05:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21no2197859qtn.1!news-out.google.com!o9ni7779qte.1!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news7
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:42:49 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <p6mguf2rs2@news7.newsguy.com>
References: <1ac80c3a-5746-47dc-b881-bba99d4faeba@googlegroups.com>
<p6d26j$1jb$1@dont-email.me>
<IIudnUeHtfE5qRbHnZ2dnUU78UGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
<p6fe0u$f3m$1@dont-email.me> <cd6n8dpl0hts06mkr9dtck0725v0p5u5a5@4ax.com>
<p6hdjn$dl0$1@dont-email.me> <UdWdndXmVYhQ3xHHnZ2dnUU78bPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<fkho8dp71624bnfv0lvm7up0haptg6i73t@4ax.com>
<6rednZF-o_SkzhHHnZ2dnUU78YPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <p6ho25$peu$1@dont-email.me>
<p6iohh0qff@news4.newsguy.com> <200220182238065598%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p6k9ad02lbh@news7.newsguy.com>
<455c0c3e-37d5-4ba0-afd6-82ddc94f25a0@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p0a0e5fc3a563e9efa31a0dfa92c37bd475a0c9d382f1d183.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <455c0c3e-37d5-4ba0-afd6-82ddc94f25a0@googlegroups.com>
X-Received-Bytes: 2705
X-Received-Body-CRC: 459761785
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/22/2018 5:07 AM, Whisky-dave wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:21:07 UTC, PeterN  wrote:
>> On 2/20/2018 10:38 PM, nospam wrote:
>>> In article<p6iohh0qff@news4.newsguy.com>, PeterN
>>> <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Last year there was a Star Trek exhibit on the Intrepid. It combined the
>>>> original with the Next Generation. I was told that most of the actors
>>>> were nice, regular guys. William Shattner was charging for his
>>>> autograph. I leave the name for that, up to the readers.
>>>
>>> most of them do that. they know the fans will pay, so why not.
>>
>> Not when they are being paid for the appearance. And the fans are making
>> a generous donation to a charity.
>> BTW I used to represent entertainers. Most thought it beneath them to
>> charge for an autograph. They either declined, or gave one free. I don't
>> know the source for your statement, but I KNOW it's not true.
> 
> I went to ST convention and most of the stars you had to pay for their autographs and pay for the
part where they stand on stage and answer questions.
> Depending on who they were the cost was set, some were free but most cost money, I only went to
the free ones.
> But this wasn't a charity event.
> 
I specifically was talking about charitable fund raisers.


-- 
PeterN