Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id u36mr4939516qtb.55.1519306983866;
Thu, 22 Feb 2018 05:43:03 -0800 (PST)
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:42:49 -0500
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<p6fe0u$f3m$> <>
<p6hdjn$dl0$> <>
<> <p6ho25$peu$>
<> <200220182238065598%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Received-Bytes: 2705
X-Received-Body-CRC: 459761785
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/22/2018 5:07 AM, Whisky-dave wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:21:07 UTC, PeterN  wrote:
>> On 2/20/2018 10:38 PM, nospam wrote:
>>> In article<>, PeterN
>>> <"peter,newdelete"> wrote:
>>>> Last year there was a Star Trek exhibit on the Intrepid. It combined the
>>>> original with the Next Generation. I was told that most of the actors
>>>> were nice, regular guys. William Shattner was charging for his
>>>> autograph. I leave the name for that, up to the readers.
>>> most of them do that. they know the fans will pay, so why not.
>> Not when they are being paid for the appearance. And the fans are making
>> a generous donation to a charity.
>> BTW I used to represent entertainers. Most thought it beneath them to
>> charge for an autograph. They either declined, or gave one free. I don't
>> know the source for your statement, but I KNOW it's not true.
> I went to ST convention and most of the stars you had to pay for their autographs and pay for the
part where they stand on stage and answer questions.
> Depending on who they were the cost was set, some were free but most cost money, I only went to
the free ones.
> But this wasn't a charity event.
I specifically was talking about charitable fund raisers.