Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.unit0.net!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news1
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: How political-correctness ruined the Pirelli calendar
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:26:21 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <p6n91h0nf4@news1.newsguy.com>
References: <1ac80c3a-5746-47dc-b881-bba99d4faeba@googlegroups.com>
<p6d26j$1jb$1@dont-email.me>
<IIudnUeHtfE5qRbHnZ2dnUU78UGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
<cd6n8dpl0hts06mkr9dtck0725v0p5u5a5@4ax.com>
<UdWdndXmVYhQ3xHHnZ2dnUU78bPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<fkho8dp71624bnfv0lvm7up0haptg6i73t@4ax.com>
<6rednZF-o_SkzhHHnZ2dnUU78YPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<p6iohh0qff@news4.newsguy.com> <200220182238065598%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p6k9ad02lbh@news7.newsguy.com>
<455c0c3e-37d5-4ba0-afd6-82ddc94f25a0@googlegroups.com>
<p6mguf2rs2@news7.newsguy.com> <ff83qrF22feU1@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p7dc51863ab06b3ce8431e62ad149ffcfa6cc0974158f36c0.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <ff83qrF22feU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 3107
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1553095494
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/22/2018 9:53 AM, android wrote:
> On 2018-02-22 13:42:49 +0000, PeterN said:
> 
>> On 2/22/2018 5:07 AM, Whisky-dave wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:21:07 UTC, PeterNĀ  wrote:
>>>> On 2/20/2018 10:38 PM, nospam wrote:
>>>>> In article<p6iohh0qff@news4.newsguy.com>, PeterN
>>>>> <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Last year there was a Star Trek exhibit on the Intrepid. It 
>>>>>> combined the
>>>>>> original with the Next Generation. I was told that most of the actors
>>>>>> were nice, regular guys. William Shattner was charging for his
>>>>>> autograph. I leave the name for that, up to the readers.
>>>>>
>>>>> most of them do that. they know the fans will pay, so why not.
>>>>
>>>> Not when they are being paid for the appearance. And the fans are 
>>>> making
>>>> a generous donation to a charity.
>>>> BTW I used to represent entertainers. Most thought it beneath them to
>>>> charge for an autograph. They either declined, or gave one free. I 
>>>> don't
>>>> know the source for your statement, but I KNOW it's not true.
>>>
>>> I went to ST convention and most of the stars you had to pay for 
>>> their autographs and pay for the part where they stand on stage and 
>>> answer questions.
>>> Depending on who they were the cost was set, some were free but most 
>>> cost money, I only went to the free ones.
>>> But this wasn't a charity event.
>>>
>> I specifically was talking about charitable fund raisers.
> 
> I prefer autographs on personal checks. Don't really care much about who 
> signs on as long as the bank honor them... :-ppp

Those were the only autographs I ever requested, or received. I gave 
them to my bank, to be returned them to their originators.

-- 
PeterN