From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Toner Vs Ink?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Toner Vs Ink?
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:07:26 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <220220181607261822%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <hjbu8d1fe34sse5bm726ie12kcib77r6vu@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a6f80d165dae92ed69a6d0dc4f1e3762";
logging-data="7016"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rUqTBGlO/6x8T9zXQwbq4"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XEV1Vhs1pWUcU3aKcfbp8wgx2Gg=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<hjbu8d1fe34sse5bm726ie12kcib77r6vu@4ax.com>, Peter Jason<pj@jostle.com> wrote:

> I usually have my photos printed at a kiosk, but for the A4 larger
> ones I use the office Fuji-Xerox laser color printer.

that's a mistake.

> Is laser-toner photos longer lasting than the Kiosk-printed variety?

it doesn't matter whether they do or not. fresh out of the printer,
they're already not as good as what can be had from even a mediocre
photo printer and a colour managed workflow.