From: Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Subject: Re: Switched from Windows to Linux on old netbook. What a difference
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Switched from Windows to Linux on old netbook. What a difference
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 05:49:07 +0100
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <33j4me-nm9.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <1e6753c2-81d9-4665-b565-fd688fba0e87@googlegroups.com>
<p6kvd2$pi8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <MPG.34f9239bdacd3fe98cf67@news.supernews.com>
<p6n9kt$e2m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <220220181547461044%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p6ngee$11gu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <220220181908112575%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<p6npv2$1jqm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <220220182130526231%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net NlOi9UAKZvPHx0EnSKh/+gYzDn4fUhBcedL1ghM+p9MjFWYKw+
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f8apxYKJZR49JJdYLDgipnJPTMk=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <220220182130526231%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-CA
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018-02-23 03:30, nospam wrote:
> In article <p6npv2$1jqm$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Ken Hart
><kwhart1@frontier.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>> Same here. I have several machines that are 10-15 years old, and
>>>>>>>> severely under-powered. They bogged down terribly with WinXP, but now
>>>>>>>> run great with Lubuntu (a light-weight version of Ubuntu).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why bother about 10-15 years old computers when you can buy a new one
>>>>>>> for 200 Euro?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If that is still too expensive, you could buy a Raspberry Pi and put
>>>>>>> Linux on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't done the Euro to Dollar conversion, but I haven't paid three
>>>>>> digits for any of my old computers.
>>>>>
>>>>> then whatever you have is junk.
>>>>
>>>> That's quite presumptuous, since you have no idea what brands/models
>>>> computers I have.
>>>
>>> it doesn't mater what brands/models they are.
>>>
>>> anything that is 'bogged down terribly with winxp' is junk. your words.
>>> winxp is hardly resource intensive.
>>>
>>> the reality is that they're long obsolete and cannot run modern
>>> software.
>>
>> Ubuntu (Lubuntu) 16.04 is fairly modern, and is what I am running now on 
>> all my "long obsolete" hardware.
> 
> ubuntu may be modern, but the hardware is too old to run modern
> software, which mostly doesn't exist for linux anyway. you can't run
> photoshop or lightroom under linux, even if you bought a brand new
> computer.

Of course you can, if you find it.


> old hardware might be ok for something like a (very) low demand server,
> but that's about it.
> 
>> At the time I switched to Linux- (I don't recall the date, but it was 
>> around the time that XP was at announced end-of-life), most of my XP 
>> computers had trouble opening Facebook. After switching to Linux (then 
>> Lubuntu 14.04), my oldest and least powerful machines had no difficulty 
>> with that metric.
> 
> that's not winxp bogging down, that's a web browser bogging down, which
> most likely was not the same browser on each, rendering the comparison
> entirely bogus.
> 
>>>> What if some of my hardware is Apple? Ergo, based on
>>>> your statement, Apple is junk.
>>>
>>> a 15 year old mac is also junk, except that it won't be 'bogged down
>>> terribly' running mac os x from its era.
>>
>> Again, I'm running reasonably modern Linux on older ("junk") machines 
>> with no difficulty.
> 
> running linux is meaningless. what matters is what apps you're using.
> 
> the main problem with linux is the sheer lack of quality software,
> photoshop and lightroom being two key examples that do not exist on
> linux.

Because nobody would buy them. Too bad quality software.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.