From: RichA <>
Subject: Re: Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id r79mr2337724qkl.62.1519431165260;
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:12:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id h62mr337021vke.4.1519431165101; Fri,
23 Feb 2018 16:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:12:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=;
References: <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
From: RichA <>
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 00:12:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 18
Print Article
Forward Article
On Friday, 23 February 2018 16:04:47 UTC-5, Eric Stevens  wrote:
> Chroma camera
> Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox.  :-(
> -- 
> Regards,
> Eric Stevens

The weight is good, but with the planet awash in used 4x5 gear, buying a new one really isn't
needed, unless you just happen to need that particular one.  What I never figured out is why didn't
they ever invent a spring-back loaded multiple-shot 4x5 with a drop-box for finished shots just
below the back?  Would save a lot of tedium.  But maybe someone did develop something like that way
back when and I just didn't see it?