From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.75.23 with SMTP id y23mr5163928qka.16.1519547526637;
Sun, 25 Feb 2018 00:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q21no4287464qtn.1!news-out.google.com!m4ni8864qte.0!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx33.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
Message-ID: <24s49dpme5tch2hc473111841bd98egk34@4ax.com>
References: <qb019d5e94buh28gf0k5tmpk9lahl7546n@4ax.com> <ffdksvF9fgoU1@mid.individual.net> <a8n39dhr5gtmb7v4vrdeok678b563f14td@4ax.com> <fff7vfFjvk1U1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 36
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 21:32:07 +1300
X-Received-Bytes: 1984
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3907390297
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1840
Print Article
Forward Article
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 08:46:55 +0100, android<here@there.was> wrote:

>On 2018-02-24 21:46:13 +0000, Eric Stevens said:
>
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 18:15:11 +0100, android<here@there.was> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-02-23 21:04:33 +0000, Eric Stevens said:
>>> 
>>>> Chroma camera
>>>>
https://www.dpreview.com/news/3631124733/the-chroma-is-a-lightweight... 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox.  :-(
>>> 
>>> I would probably go for a used fieldie... Prey tell if you find an
>>> affordable back to go with it... Good luck!
>> 
>> 'affordable'. Now there is the operative word.   :-(
>
>Maybe you could adapt this benchcam approach to your fieldcam:
>
><https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXxjsz6J5Bg>
>
>Keep us posted! :-))

That's camera is a bit crude and doesn't have all the movements I
want. Also, I suspect it's as large as it is because of the problem of
making the more delicate parts in wood in a smaller size.
Traditionally they used to make them in brass. But the problem remains
of finding a full size digital back.
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens