Subject: Re: The Smartphone Upgrade?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin2!aspen.stu.neva.ru!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin.stu.neva.ru!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news4
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: The Smartphone Upgrade?
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:41:54 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <p71rei0mkm@news4.newsguy.com>
References: <ffhnq4F6hroU1@mid.individual.net>
<b7ednecTeJPcIQ7HnZ2dnUU7-f3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pa580fc41ef7c1911c32d65a1145001f1bd41e5f4e7a08267.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <b7ednecTeJPcIQ7HnZ2dnUU7-f3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2/26/2018 2:50 AM, Savageduck wrote:
> android<here@there.was> wrote:
>> "Upgrading from a smartphone camera to an entry-level interchangeable
>> lens camera (ILC) can be considered to some people a daunting task."
>>
>> <http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-announces-the-eos-m50-mirrorless-c...
> 
> OK!
> 
> ...but you still have a fat Canon. I believe there are better 24 MP APS-C
> ILC’s available, even if your main purchasing focus is 4K video rather than
> still photography.
> 
> Personally I am a stills photographer, not a videographer, and as such I
> find the move toward video development by all of the manufacturers a little
> irritating.
> 

Yep!
You and I are old fashioned farts. Just as there are painters who lament 
digital painting, and devotees of film photography. Markets are amorphous.

-- 
PeterN