From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: The Smartphone Upgrade?
Full headers:
From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: The Smartphone Upgrade?
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:39:14 +0100 (CET)
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: cFV//Wdhn/azA6jPU3YcSQZg16+zUi7XF3sphFytfaycTS3VhW
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AWI2GL58uyt+Cz5HaUACW4xC15s=
X-Newsreader: PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.Free:1.65
X-Archive: encrypt
Print Article
Forward Article
PeterN <"peter,newdelete"> Wrote in message:
> On 2/26/2018 2:50 AM, Savageduck wrote:
>> android<here@there.was> wrote:
>>> "Upgrading from a smartphone camera to an entry-level interchangeable
>>> lens camera (ILC) can be considered to some people a daunting task."
>>> <
>> OK!
>> ...but you still have a fat Canon. I believe there are better 24 MP APS-C
>> ILC’s available, even if your main purchasing focus is 4K video rather than
>> still photography.
>> Personally I am a stills photographer, not a videographer, and as such I
>> find the move toward video development by all of the manufacturers a little
>> irritating.
> Yep!
> You and I are old fashioned farts. Just as there are painters who lament 
> digital painting, and devotees of film photography. Markets are amorphous.
I'm not looking for video
in an *ILC. All I've done soo far is
 transfering my farthers double eight home movies to MP4s with the
 M. I used a fast 'n dirty but surprisingly effective method
 decribed on me blog.
Bats can't tell us apart!

----Android NewsGroup Reader----