From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:47:41 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <280220181047417018%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <ffnkt9FgviuU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4cdf1dc9e60d29fb50f6bb776d76306d";
logging-data="12988"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/z422YI+iSk+YrslC8/hOx"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MbCiN8rg1s9TF6wivaNLovQ9Yko=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<ffnkt9FgviuU1@mid.individual.net>, Paul Carmichael<wibbleypants@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Looking at scanning a few negatives.

then have a professional scanning service do it, who will use pro
equipment to do it and do a much better job than you will.

> Are any of these any good?

no.

> I don't really want to spend more than 150