From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:47:41 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <280220181047417018%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="4cdf1dc9e60d29fb50f6bb776d76306d";
logging-data="12988"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/z422YI+iSk+YrslC8/hOx"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MbCiN8rg1s9TF6wivaNLovQ9Yko=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, Paul Carmichael<> wrote:

> Looking at scanning a few negatives.

then have a professional scanning service do it, who will use pro
equipment to do it and do a much better job than you will.

> Are any of these any good?


> I don't really want to spend more than 150