Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
Full headers:
From: Alan Browne <>
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:39:39 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <p76pgt$4fp$>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:39:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="634b8180f773568a5d546dc03992eba1";
logging-data="4601"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Zlm357DSsVIisoJr6Nrb8i+F8oKG8Ulo="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:45.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IkAWGyUILEBs7mfTwpBxsOy8loo=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 2018.02.28 07:16, Paul Carmichael wrote:
> Howdy folks.
> Looking at scanning a few negatives.

I'll join the chorus of if it's just a few, then get it done by some 
local or mail in service.  Be sure to get best appropriate quality which 
would be around 4000 points per inch sampling.