From: ultred ragnusen <>
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Full headers:
From: ultred ragnusen <>
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:51:16 -0800
Organization: NNTP Server
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <>
References: <O3ulC.173256$mJ1.28255@fx13.fr7> <> <280220181127370843%nospam@nospam.invalid> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
Barry Margolin<> wrote:

>>> Yet another good reason to use a dumb flip phone.
>> definitely not. those are *far* easier to crack. they aren't even
>> encrypted.
> But you probably don't have much incriminating data on it in the first 
> place.

I agree with the sentiment to not /put/ incriminating data on a phone,
where a dumb phone will naturally contain far less automatically generating
data in the first place.

But I bring up the sentiment that anyone who thinks /any/ phone is /safe/
is a fool, because, for a criminal anyway, the biggest incrimination is
simply the ping to the cellular tower that makes a cell phone work as a
cell phone.

Those who /feel/ safer with brand X phones versus brand Y phones because
the marketing of brand X is better than brand Y, I posit, are fools,
because the weakest set of links of all cell phones are the same.