Next <
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.27.229 with SMTP id m98mr14284256qkh.58.1519858177603;
Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:49:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.2.74 with SMTP id 71mr2067522vkc.6.1519858177406; Wed, 28
Feb 2018 14:49:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!r16no1242947qtn.1!news-out.google.com!o9ni347qte.1!nntp.google.com!t24no1249348qtn.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:49:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ffnkt9FgviuU1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.157.72.115;
posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.157.72.115
References: <ffnkt9FgviuU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fbbebc01-25bb-4b72-b890-53189fc7651f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:49:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 29
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 07:16:50 UTC-5, Paul Carmichael  wrote:
> Howdy folks.
> 
> Looking at scanning a few negatives.
> 
> Are any of these any good?
> 
>
https://www.amazon.es/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=scan+negatives&tag...
> 
> I don't really want to spend more than 150€.
> 
> I know it's not the place to ask, but I just happened to be here.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> -- 
> Paul.
> 
>   https://paulc.es/
>   https://asetrad.org

Nikon has a piece of cheap crap coming out, er, will allow you to shoot images from your camera
in-place of using a scanner.  It mounts on the front of a lens, and you mount the negatives in a
sliding rail.  Nothing new, they've had this kind of thing around since the 60's.  It's a bit
rinky-dinky but even that would allow (if you have at least a 24mp camera) reasonably good results
and would be fast enough to use moderately.