From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.17.24 with SMTP id c24mr880836qtj.57.1519900598114;
Thu, 01 Mar 2018 02:36:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.16.33 with SMTP id g33mr145857vki.13.1519900597981; Thu,
01 Mar 2018 02:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!r16no1498135qtn.1!news-out.google.com!a13ni40qtd.1!nntp.google.com!r16no1498134qtn.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 02:36:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ffo4ohFkh26U1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <ffnkt9FgviuU1@mid.individual.net> <79637b26-b2f5-4e87-9368-1c690ea99751@googlegroups.com>
<ffnpfgFi0d6U1@mid.individual.net> <ffo290Fjv4rU1@mid.individual.net>
<ffo3qmFkaljU1@mid.individual.net> <15654bc9-3b67-44e5-bcf0-5e480908850c@googlegroups.com>
<ffo4ohFkh26U1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <07b9cf40-d255-46b2-988f-b5ae62865a8f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Scanning negatives
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 10:36:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3839113164
X-Received-Bytes: 3373
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 16:47:19 UTC, android  wrote:
> On 2018-02-28 16:38:06 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
> 
> > On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 16:31:23 UTC, android  wrote:
> >> On 2018-02-28 16:04:47 +0000, Paul Carmichael said:
> >> 
> >>> On 28/02/18 14:34, android wrote:
> >>>> On 2018-02-28 13:01:10 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 12:16:50 UTC, Paul Carmichael  wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>>>>
https://www.amazon.es/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=scan+negatives&tag... 
> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I don't really want to spend more than 150€.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> One really have to define what the quality one require is. Could this thing do?
> >>> 
> >>> Nice would be nice :-), but I don't care if it takes ma a minute or 2 to scan.
> >>> 
> >>>> <https://www.ebay.com/itm/352284896307>
> >>> 
> >>> No idea. Slides = negatives?
> >> 
> >> If the holder takes strips then you can correct in post, make sure that it can.
> >> -- 
> >> teleportation kills
> > 
> > But he did mention disc negatives which wwere pretty crap to start with 
> > and on a disc makes them difficult to put in most neg carriers.
> 
> No he didn't...

Oh yes he did.

on the 28th Feb Paul C said 
"I live in the middle of nowhere. If I can get something cheap enough, I would probably find a bit
more use for it later. I've got quite a few negs in disc format. Dunno if I'd be able to scan them. "


> I do agree that the discs probably was created to get 
> mankind used to tecno dementia!

and it certainly worked on you ;-P