Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model InExistence
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news2
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In
Existence
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:50:50 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <p797gs0lac@news2.newsguy.com>
References: <O3ulC.173256$mJ1.28255@fx13.fr7>
<ffo2veFk7uiU3@mid.individual.net> <280220181127370843%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<barmar-14256C.11355828022018@reader.eternal-september.org>
<280220181311413591%star@sky.net>
<1u0pxuq8eh5vl$.12khrhaik83zs.dlg@40tude.net>
<280220182336381013%star@sky.net>
<16js8xeniqzb5$.1rsedrk0gykqk$.dlg@40tude.net>
<010320180939330621%star@sky.net>
<1m5t0g04z96tw.1d5oa0toqb0ev$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p302f07513f4ca7c3789266d54abb1cf2d2280b6260222b77.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <1m5t0g04z96tw.1d5oa0toqb0ev$.dlg@40tude.net>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 230976540
X-Received-Bytes: 3510
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/1/2018 10:02 AM, ultred ragnusen wrote:
> Davoud<star@sky.net> wrote:
> 
>> As for the safety of phones, what I might or might not know about that
>> is not for your eyes. In essence, the safety of your mobile phone lies
>> in the fact that no one is listening. You and your communications are
>> of no importance to the intelligence community.
> 
> You /wish/ that were the case the our government doesn't illegally spy on
> our citizens, but you have to remember /many/ a president has broken the
> Constitution by ordering our own government to spy on our citizens,
> illegally.
> 
> Take, for example, the well-known fact of what J. Edgar Hoover did over a
> series of presidencies, or that Lyndon Johnson ordered the spying of
> anti-war demonstrators.
> 
> Also take, for example, those Cessnas flying daily over our cities,
> scooping up the IMEIs and locations of tens of thousands of innocent people
> in each flight.
> 
> Bear in mind that the actual communication (the very words spoken and the
> texts sent) of law-abiding US citizens are also scooped up very often by
> the intelligence community, e.g., on any overseas telephone call to your
> own grandchildren as they travel abroad.
> 
> Back to the main point, there is no communication device that is secure.
> None. Anyone who thinks they have security should just read the Zimmermann
> telegram, or read about the Purple or JN24 or the black code or ultra
> enigma communications or even the Cairo diplomatic cables of WWII infamy,
> where entire extremely well motivated and well funded government
> bureaucracies /thought/ that their communications were secure, which made
> them /feel/ safe, just as the owners of brand X mobile devices are made to
> /feel/ safe, that feeling for which they pay through the nose, and which is
> vapor.
> 
> All this doesn't mean we should give up on security; it just means that no
> mobile device is secure when all of them have the same weak links.
> 

This will help you:
<https://www.amazon.com/Electro-Deflecto/b/ref=w_bl_sl_ap_ap_web_1511...


-- 
PeterN