From: ultred ragnusen <>
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Full headers:
From: ultred ragnusen <>
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 18:19:58 -0800
Organization: NNTP Server
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <4iy38ejpmdp6$.1onbjo4t694lx$>
References: <O3ulC.173256$mJ1.28255@fx13.fr7> <> <280220181127370843%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <> <280220181333394546%nospam@nospam.invalid> <18rprvf1e3kqf.ewl8o6i04y7n$> <> <> <lydbmkqc86f3$.1p6co9jwzyn5l$> <010320182105106491%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
nospam<nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>> changing IMEI
>> numbers, 
> that's illegal.

Nospam's utter lack of credibility is astounding.

What you seem to forget so easily is that we've had this discussion in
spades in the past, where, on Android at least, it's trivial to
automatically change your reported IMEI number on the fly, and where it's
/not/ illegal in most of the world, and, even where it is illegal (e.g., in
the UK), something like 3 people have been convicted in something like a
dozen years, where even the authors of the bill (whatever they call a law
in Parliment) said very clearly it was simply a /symbolic/ political
gesture (aka, a cheap political trick).

Thread: IMEI number 

Mr. Denham, Hansard, Mobile Telephones (Re-programming) Bill [Lords],
House of Commons Debate, 22 July 2002 vol 389 cc706-28, column 711