Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model InExistence
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news2
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In
Existence
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:46:28 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy.com
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <p7bo4601puq@news2.newsguy.com>
References: <O3ulC.173256$mJ1.28255@fx13.fr7>
<ffo2veFk7uiU3@mid.individual.net> <280220181127370843%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<barmar-14256C.11355828022018@reader.eternal-september.org>
<280220181311413591%star@sky.net>
<1u0pxuq8eh5vl$.12khrhaik83zs.dlg@40tude.net>
<280220182336381013%star@sky.net>
<16js8xeniqzb5$.1rsedrk0gykqk$.dlg@40tude.net>
<010320180939330621%star@sky.net>
<1m5t0g04z96tw.1d5oa0toqb0ev$.dlg@40tude.net> <p797gs0lac@news2.newsguy.com>
<1xxjbobasi29f.1giw1htnrfcsh$.dlg@40tude.net>
<010320181154545437%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<q02i4iqeqelw$.1xo8ryiboil3b.dlg@40tude.net>
<010320181211446034%nospam@nospam.invalid>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p401ddd6ed3ab7c33722dd657d90a410db93b3e0f6bc941dc.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
In-Reply-To: <010320181211446034%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3470696382
X-Received-Bytes: 2581
Print Article
Forward Article
On 3/1/2018 12:11 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article <q02i4iqeqelw$.1xo8ryiboil3b.dlg@40tude.net>, ultred
> ragnusen<ultred@ragnusen.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>>>> However, you'll note that I simply stated that no consumer mobile device is
>>>> secure, simply because they all have the same weak links.
>>>
>>> that is false.
>>
>> You don't even /know/ what those weak links are.
> 
> not only do i know what they are, but i know what's needed to crack
> iphone encryption. you do not.
> 
> all you do is spew nonsense about planes flying overhead (which doesn't
> actually happen) that scan for imeis, which won't do a damned thing to
> crack the encryption on the phone itself.
> 
> for that, you need the passcode, which if it's complex, will take a few
> billion years to crack, and the imei won't help you at all,
> 

If you statement is true, the iPhone has been in existence for several 
billion + 2 years.

<http://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-cracked-iphone-encryption-averted-lega...

-- 
PeterN