From: ultred ragnusen <ultred@ragnusen.com>
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ultred ragnusen <ultred@ragnusen.com>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 14:30:24 -0800
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <wxxxlnq2hq1q$.1vb0enx01c52x.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <O3ulC.173256$mJ1.28255@fx13.fr7> <280220181311413591%star@sky.net> <1u0pxuq8eh5vl$.12khrhaik83zs.dlg@40tude.net> <280220182336381013%star@sky.net> <16js8xeniqzb5$.1rsedrk0gykqk$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320180939330621%star@sky.net> <1m5t0g04z96tw.1d5oa0toqb0ev$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181047555290%star@sky.net> <2cvg4rd5uqh6.ecqy9guvbzqt.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181154535406%nospam@nospam.invalid> <485uw4x5dokz.1f871irgavgt4.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181211446070%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1666bend2kjq7.14g2ae20vwt83$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181226138179%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1hihypjelja41.y6rwjo9h3qs1.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181237047255%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1rbw23k4iqgmk$.o2wvx8jaaxaw$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181402314866%nospam@nospam.invalid> <yqkhtodfj3kb$.zwxd9lnepxg7.dlg@40tude.net> <XnsA899AB19C7BF7HT1@qad51nTEAK.HucAEO2qYp688z0rz6P1kNo1.DMTI0lc>
<1moww6gxbrn7n.1o687u1ghdgtw$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mFHKSmhmK9h900yAazI9wQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.84
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
ultred ragnusen<ultred@ragnusen.com> wrote:

> There are two ways around /every/ cipher.

The related point here is that Brand X marketing (and nospam) want us to
believe that there is only one way, the frontal attack, against a cipher.

This serves their purpose to ignore that there is always another way which
isn't frontal.

It serves Brand X marketing purposes for people to /ignore/ the other way
around any cipher.. which ... I posit ... is false security.

That Brand X marketing makes its users /feel/ secure is commendable from
the emotional well being standpoint, but that's the only good it does.