From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 17:33:08 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <020320181733086827%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <O3ulC.173256$mJ1.28255@fx13.fr7> <280220181311413591%star@sky.net> <1u0pxuq8eh5vl$.12khrhaik83zs.dlg@40tude.net> <280220182336381013%star@sky.net> <16js8xeniqzb5$.1rsedrk0gykqk$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320180939330621%star@sky.net> <1m5t0g04z96tw.1d5oa0toqb0ev$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181047555290%star@sky.net> <2cvg4rd5uqh6.ecqy9guvbzqt.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181154535406%nospam@nospam.invalid> <485uw4x5dokz.1f871irgavgt4.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181211446070%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1666bend2kjq7.14g2ae20vwt83$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181226138179%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1hihypjelja41.y6rwjo9h3qs1.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181237047255%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1rbw23k4iqgmk$.o2wvx8jaaxaw$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320181402314866%nospam@nospam.invalid> <yqkhtodfj3kb$.zwxd9lnepxg7.dlg@40tude.net> <XnsA899AB19C7BF7HT1@qad51nTEAK.HucAEO2qYp688z0rz6P1kNo1.DMTI0lc> <1moww6gxbrn7n.1o687u1ghdgtw$.dlg@40tude.net> <wxxxlnq2hq1q$.1vb0enx01c52x.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5b0ebe66ab8ac5c9b856d5b7a26e037d";
logging-data="18525"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18x3emjPhQ0N5LI9vG6Yc5Z"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FVvBoAu3Pe30Ktn7n8BOwYAr0K0=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <wxxxlnq2hq1q$.1vb0enx01c52x.dlg@40tude.net>, ultred
ragnusen<ultred@ragnusen.com> wrote:

> 
> > There are two ways around /every/ cipher.
> 
> The related point here is that Brand X marketing (and nospam) want us to
> believe that there is only one way, the frontal attack, against a cipher.

other ways are not guaranteed to exist.

you know *very* little about encryption.