From: ultred ragnusen <ultred@ragnusen.com>
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ultred ragnusen <ultred@ragnusen.com>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:04:54 -0800
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <vegrt9lyrruh.xe3rxpfb8lho$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <O3ulC.173256$mJ1.28255@fx13.fr7> <ffo2veFk7uiU3@mid.individual.net> <280220181127370843%nospam@nospam.invalid> <barmar-14256C.11355828022018@reader.eternal-september.org> <wuqbb214bj13.12wc1uwm78r8x.dlg@40tude.net> <280220181333394546%nospam@nospam.invalid> <18rprvf1e3kqf.ewl8o6i04y7n$.dlg@40tude.net> <barmar-80C0B4.11295201032018@reader.eternal-september.org> <010320181409015883%star@sky.net> <lydbmkqc86f3$.1p6co9jwzyn5l$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320182105106491%nospam@nospam.invalid> <4iy38ejpmdp6$.1onbjo4t694lx$.dlg@40tude.net> <010320182127427585%nospam@nospam.invalid> <0001HW.2049645602DBA353700007E892CF@news.supernews.com> <wyleuwp5xa6o$.90v1b8hoxxtu$.dlg@40tude.net> <020320181814245385%nospam@nospam.invalid>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mFHKSmhmK9h900yAazI9wQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.84
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Print Article
Forward Article
nospam<nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>> 
>>> Fraud is deliberate deception to secure unfair or unlawful 
>>> gain, or to deprive a victim of a legal right.
>> 
>> The readers will note that nospam has been told many times that fraud
>> contains /multiple/ elements, /all/ of which must be present for it to be
>> considered fraud.
> 
> altering an imei meets all of them.
> 
>> (1) A material representation was made; 
> 
> the altered imei.
> 
>> (2) the representation was false; 
> 
> the imei is not the original, therefore false.
> 
>> (3) the speaker knew it was false;
> 
> it was knowingly altered. 
> 
>> (4) the speaker intended the other party should act upon it; 
> 
> the other party being the cellular carrier.
> 
>> (5) the party acted in reliance on the representation; 
> 
> and they did, thinking you had a different phone than the one you
> actually had.
> 
>> (6) the party thereby suffered injury.
> 
> providing service to which you are not entitled.
> 
> fraud.

Remind me to use you as a defense lawyer who will say anything to get his
client off the hook, but at the same time, remind me not to suggest you as
a prosecutor, as they have to follow the rules of law.