From: Eric Stevens <>
Subject: Re: Sort of on topic - Coolpix 900 is/are good for rockets
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id w10mr14743472qtg.44.1520377869048;
Tue, 06 Mar 2018 15:11:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Stevens <>
Subject: Re: Sort of on topic - Coolpix 900 is/are good for rockets
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 26
Organization: Forte -
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 12:11:09 +1300
X-Received-Bytes: 1694
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2499405134
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1550
Print Article
Forward Article
On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 14:14:28 +0000, newshound<> wrote:

>On 04/03/2018 07:15, Eric Stevens wrote:
>> or
>Impressive for hand held (but why would one *not* use a tripod in such a 
>case). I'm only a low-end amateur, but my Velbon DV-7000 is a modest 
>price for a damped tripod.

The photographer was in a crowd of people being shepherded from one
part of the site to another. I would expect a tripod is something he
could easily do without in the circumstances.
>I've always been a bit sceptical about extreme zooms, but I can see that 
>they have a niche for a one-camera person who wants to do (say) a bit of 
>wildlife or "long range" sports.

That was why it was recommended to him.


Eric Stevens