Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model InExistence
On 06/03/2018 21:05, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> In article<firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> ultred ragnusen<email@example.com> writes:
>> Barry Margolin<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>>> Yet another good reason to use a dumb flip phone.
>>>> definitely not. those are *far* easier to crack. they aren't even
>>> But you probably don't have much incriminating data on it in the first
>> I agree with the sentiment to not /put/ incriminating data on a phone,
>> where a dumb phone will naturally contain far less automatically generating
>> data in the first place.
>> But I bring up the sentiment that anyone who thinks /any/ phone is /safe/
>> is a fool, because, for a criminal anyway, the biggest incrimination is
>> simply the ping to the cellular tower that makes a cell phone work as a
>> cell phone.
>> Those who /feel/ safer with brand X phones versus brand Y phones because
>> the marketing of brand X is better than brand Y, I posit, are fools,
>> because the weakest set of links of all cell phones are the same.
> The weakest part of any device is the wetware - the person operating it.
Listen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhZv3QjmbdA