From: David_B <David_B@nomail.afraid.org>
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model InExistence
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.fcku.it!peer01.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx03.fr7.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In
Existence
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.apps
References: <O3ulC.173256$mJ1.28255@fx13.fr7>
<ffo2veFk7uiU3@mid.individual.net> <280220181127370843%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<barmar-14256C.11355828022018@reader.eternal-september.org>
<wuqbb214bj13.12wc1uwm78r8x.dlg@40tude.net> <2oDnC.94943$BX2.10678@fx22.iad>
From: David_B <David_B@nomail.afraid.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2oDnC.94943$BX2.10678@fx22.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <rhQnC.94930$xS2.61953@fx03.fr7>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 11:45:27 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 11:45:26 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2320
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1556778116
Print Article
Forward Article
On 06/03/2018 21:05, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> In article<wuqbb214bj13.12wc1uwm78r8x.dlg@40tude.net>,
> 	ultred ragnusen<ultred@ragnusen.com> writes:
>> Barry Margolin<barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yet another good reason to use a dumb flip phone.
>>>>
>>>> definitely not. those are *far* easier to crack. they aren't even
>>>> encrypted.
>>>
>>> But you probably don't have much incriminating data on it in the first
>>> place.
>>
>> I agree with the sentiment to not /put/ incriminating data on a phone,
>> where a dumb phone will naturally contain far less automatically generating
>> data in the first place.
>>
>> But I bring up the sentiment that anyone who thinks /any/ phone is /safe/
>> is a fool, because, for a criminal anyway, the biggest incrimination is
>> simply the ping to the cellular tower that makes a cell phone work as a
>> cell phone.
>>
>> Those who /feel/ safer with brand X phones versus brand Y phones because
>> the marketing of brand X is better than brand Y, I posit, are fools,
>> because the weakest set of links of all cell phones are the same.
> 
> The weakest part of any device is the wetware - the person operating it.

True!

Listen here:  	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhZv3QjmbdA

Enjoy!  :-)