From: Moderate <>
Subject: Re: So???
Full headers:
From: Moderate <>
Subject: Re: So???
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:04:55 -0600 (CST)
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <ovsjm8$1h9r$>
References: <> <ovs9i7$11dh$> <ovsasb$d3q$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Newsreader: PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.VIP:1.65
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Print Article
Forward Article
Alan Baker<> Wrote in message:
> On 2017-12-01 11:12 AM, Moderate wrote:
>> Dene<> Wrote in message:
>>> President-ELECT may have directed Flynn to talk to the Russians. So....?!  What does this have
to do with the election???
>> Are you a little anxious?
>> It has nothing to do with the election.  Flynn plead guilty for
>>   the same reason that Trump fired him.
> Ummmm...
> Flynn pleaded guilty because they had him dead to rights...
> ...on much more than just that.
> That's why his plea agreement requires him to cooperate with the ongoing 
> investigation.
> :-)

Generally a cooperating witness is charged with the same scheme
 the principle is accused of.  The idea is for prosecutors to
 build the case by questioning the witness to explain the scheme
 and implicate the principle.

That isn't happening, because there is no scheme.

Q. "What were you charged with?"

A. "Lying"

Q. "Why are you here?"

A. "To tell the truth."

Send how your moronic scenario plays out?